History and
Science on Trial
In Fall 2002, Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of
Industrial Pollution, was published jointly by the University of California
Press and the Milbank Fund as one in a series that addressed a variety of
aspects of health policy. Briefly, the book looked at questions regarding how
two industries, the lead industry and the chemical industry, reacted when faced
with information regarding the potential dangers of their products to human
health during the twentieth century.
The history of the lead and vinyl industries offers clear insight into
why the relationship between the public and big business is so strained
today. Despite the potent evidence
of the dangers of their products, these industries hid information, controlled
research, continued to market their products as safe, and attempted to
influence the political process in order to avoid regulation.
The book was unusual in a number of respects, including the fact that a
number of the chapters on the two primary cases were based on documents historians
rarely if ever use in critical evaluations of corporate behavior. These
documents were internal company correspondence, memos and minutes of meetings
of both the lead and chemical industry trade associations and some of their
member companies. The extensive cache of documents we gathered had become
available during the previous number of years through legal proceedings in
cases involving injured children, consumers and workers.
Lawyers for some of the largest chemical companies in the world are
particularly concerned about two chapters in Deceit and Denial that
detail how, in the early 1970s, the industry planned to deceive the government
about industryÕs own findings that VCM caused cancer in animals exposed to
relatively low levels of exposure.
Gerald Markowitz has been retained in a number of cases where the
families of workers who have died as a result of their exposure to vinyl
chloride and has been deposed for many days by lawyers for Monsanto, Airco,
Dow, Union Carbide, Goodyear, Goodrich, and Shell among others large corporations.
This is a legitimate part of the legal process. But in addition, the press and
the foundation that supported our work were subpoenaed for all of their records
concerning our book, their relationship to each other and the peer review
process. Following this, five of the eight outside peer reviewers were also
subpoenaed to provide all of their records related to the book and to appear at
depositions for questioning by company lawyers (This has been written up in the
Chronicle of Higher Education.
In
addition to these highly unusual, if unprecedented, intrusions into the
academic peer review process, the chemical industry hired Philip Scranton,
Professor of History at Rutgers in Camden, to write an expert report about two
of the chapters and to attack our professional standards, ethics and integrity.